h1

America the great, US policy is trapped in a “Wars of Defense” doctrine

May 27, 2012

Ah yes, people are loosing their savings and homes and jobs at record rates, cost to live keeps rising, the government is broke but they somehow always have enough to blow things up or did I miss something, welcome to the W.M.S.A. (War Mongering States of America).

American people are responsible for crimes commited by their puppet government in hands of owners to USA – Jews and Zionists – the same way as Jews (provocators of WWII) held German people responsible for WWII.

US” policy is trapped in a “Wars of Defense” doctrine, this is directly caused by the US dollar system and its links to Petroleum products , this is the end of a failed policy.

The problem is that the design of the policy was a financial design originally and thus there is no easy financial solution , with regard to the “excess of capacity” and “drop of demand” that is caused by a move away from that policy.

Consequently however the further extended the policy it has been show to be the more fragile and the more susceptible to moves in aforementioned “demand” or lack of with regard to the US dollar design.

Which in turn seems to apparently drive a mechanism which by the reaction is further belligerences directed more and more towards the slightest deviances from this dictated policy.

But, however , now that policy has directly run up against itself. We have two diverging interests that would seem to be very well locked together

1. Global trade and policy of  “economic” continued growth.
                                                                &
2. That trade being under the aforementioned dictated policy.

The main significant problem being that the Policy; or to be more specific, the result of the policy (really the defenses of that policy) has now and is increasingly stopping the growth that the policy was supposedly designed to achieve.

The “if we can not control it we will break it” policy appears to now finally reached its natural conclusion, there was a lot of broken, but the global situation has now become more complex.

The move away from domestic natural feedback mechanisms with regard to combination evolutionary technology , and moving this capital/energy towards belligerent “Defense Products” means the centralization (or at least partly) of domestic society with regard to technological evolution.

I’m not saying that the US as a nation is out of the picture with regard to this, all that I am contesting is that the net effect is negative;

Combine that with domestic sociological and economic issues, and you have a civil society that is increasingly inhibited (in spite of FFoI) (free flow of Information) , the inhibiters are not specifically centralized media but , increasing monopoly aspects , (a fairly recent appearance to the US domestic system)

Monopoly is the direct result of the end life cycle of the aforementioned policy.

Clearly if the Federation wishes to Modernize , basically take the policy  and do essentially the opposite of the clearly able to be seen differences, as these are not unique to the US or any nation.

3.
They are as follows:

Create policy to encourage a civil feedback system, not just towards government policy , but towards new combination technology.

1. The quickest way towards that is to encourage micro business.
2. Decentralize technology.
3. “Seed” technological ideas into the feedback system (the society) , the society becomes technology.
4. Stopping monopoly is a result of the preceding primarily the SME aspect, competition and feedback civil society naturally kills monopoly, with choices , society chooses local and small every time , because markets are social, the only thing that can keep Monopoly alive is a centralized power, a Policy or a Government with a policy directive.
Some “Monopolies” appear a necessity until one takes a closer look at how competition can be integrated into the chain of flow on effect to the society. 

 

Leave a comment